Below
is the full text of the statement on the timetable for the 2015 general
elections by the Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission,
INEC, Professor Atahiru M. Jega at a press conference on the 7th pf
February, 2015.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Introduction
We
invited you here today to make known the position of the Independent
National Electoral Commission (INEC) on the timetable for the 2015
general elections.
Let me state from the outset that the
Commission’s position was reached after carefully weighing the
suggestions from briefings held with different stakeholders in the
electoral process.
The conduct of elections in a country like
Nigeria is invariably a collective venture that involves not just the
Election Management Body (EMB), but also a diverse range of
stakeholders, notably security agencies, political parties and their
candidates, voters, as well as interest groups, such as the civil
society organizations and the media.
To guarantee successful
conduct of elections, there are things that are wholly the
responsibility of the EMB. But there are other things critical for the
success of elections, which fall outside the control of the EMB.
In
other words, while INEC must work hard to perfect its systems and
processes for conducting elections, and take responsibility for any
imperfections thereof, whatever the Commission does may not by itself be
sufficient to guarantee the success of elections.
There are a
number of issues in the preparation and conduct of an election, the most
critical of which is security, which is not under the control of INEC.
Current State of INEC’s Preparedness
On
Thursday, February 5, 2015, I was invited to brief the National Council
of State, which is the highest advisory to the President comprising
past and present leaders in Nigeria, on the level of preparedness of
INEC to conduct the 2015 general elections.
I made a presentation
to the Council titled ‘Preparations for the 2015 General Elections:
Progress Report,’ in which I gave a detailed account of what the
Commission has been doing in readiness for the national elections
(National Assembly and Presidential) scheduled for February 14th, and
the state elections (Governorship and State Assembly) scheduled for
February 28th, 2015.
The summary of my presentation to the
National Council of State meeting is that, for matters under its
control, INEC is substantially ready for the general elections as
scheduled, despite discernible challenges being encountered with some of
its processes like the collection of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) by
registered members of the public.
In addition, INEC has been doing
everything it can to facilitate the collection of the PVCs by
registered members of the public. As at 5th February 2015, the total
number of PVCs collected was 45, 829, 808, representing 66.58% of the
total number of registered voters.
In the delivery and deployment
of electoral materials, INEC is also at a comfort level in its readiness
for the general elections as scheduled (see the presentation to the
Council of State).
The Commission’s preparations are not yet
perfect or fully accomplished. But our level of preparedness, despite a
few challenges, is sufficient to conduct free, fair and credible
elections as scheduled on February 14th and February 28th.
Compared
with 2011 when, within a short time, we conducted general elections
that were universally adjudged free, fair and credible and the best in
Nigeria’s recent electoral history, our processes are today better
refined, more robust and therefore capable of delivering even better
elections.
Other Variables
But as I mentioned earlier, there
are some other variables equally crucial for successful conduct of the
2015 general elections that are outside the control of INEC. One
important variable is security for the elections.
While the
Commission has a very good working relationship with all security
agencies, especially on the platform of the Inter-agency Consultative
Committee on Election Security (ICCES) since its inception in 2010, it
has become pertinent for it to seriously consider the security advisory
presented to it by the Security and Intelligence Services.
I would
like to reiterate here that INEC is an EMB and not a security agency.
It relies on the security services to provide a safe environment for
personnel, voters, election observers and election materials to conduct
elections wherever it deploys.
Where the security services strongly
advise otherwise, it would be unconscionable of the Commission to deploy
personnel and call voters out in such a situation.
Last
Wednesday, which was a day before the Council of State meeting, the
office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) wrote a letter to the
Commission, drawing attention to recent developments in four Northeast
states of Borno, Yobe, Adamawa and Gombe currently experiencing the
challenge of insurgency.
The letter stated that security could not be guaranteed during the proposed period in February for the general elections.
This
advisory was reinforced at the Council of State meeting on Thursday
where the NSA and all the Armed Services and Intelligence Chiefs
unanimously reiterated that the safety and security of our operations
cannot be guaranteed, and that the Security Services needed at least six
weeks within which to conclude a major military operation against the
insurgency in the Northeast; and that during this operation, the
military will be concentrating its attention in the theatre of
operations such that they may not be able to provide the traditional
support they render to the Police and other agencies during elections.
INEC’s Decision
We
have done wide ranging consultation to enable us have as much input as
is necessary before taking an informed decision. In the series of
consultations that we held with stakeholders, the questions consistently
posed to them for consideration are:
(i) In view of the latest
development, should INEC proceed with the conduct of the general
elections as scheduled in spite of this strong advice; and if so, what
alternative security arrangements are available to be put in place?
(ii)
Or, should INEC take the advice and adjust the schedules of the general
elections within the framework of Constitutional provisions?
The
Commission held a meeting after the consultations, and decided to take
the advice of the Security Chiefs and adjust the dates of the elections.
We have done this relying on Section 26(1) of the Electoral 2010 (As
Amended), which states thus: “Where a date has been appointed for the
holding of an election, and there is reason to believe that a serious
breach of the peace is likely to occur if the election is proceeded with
on that date or it is impossible to conduct the elections as a result
of natural disasters or other emergencies, the Commission may postpone
the election and shall in respect of the area, or areas concerned,
appoint another date for the holding of the postponed election, provided
that such reason for the postponement is cogent and verifiable”.
INEC
not being a security agency that could by itself guarantee protection
for personnel and materials, as well as voters during elections, the
Commission cannot lightly wave off the advice by the nation’s Security
Chiefs.
The Commission is specifically concerned about the
security of our ad hoc staff who constitute at least 600,000 young men
and women, together with our regular staff, voters, election observers
as well as election materials painstakingly acquired over the last one
and half years.
This concern is limited not just to the areas in
the North-eastern part of Nigeria experiencing insurgency; the risk of
deploying young men and women and calling people to exercise their
democratic rights in a situation where their security cannot be
guaranteed is a most onerous responsibility.
Under such
circumstances, few EMBs across the world, if any, would contemplate
proceeding with the elections as proceeding with the elections as
scheduled.
No matter the extent of INEC’s preparedness, therefore,
if the security of personnel, voters, election observers and election
materials cannot be guaranteed, the life of innocent young men and women
as well the prospects of free, fair, credible and peaceful elections
would be greatly jeopardised.
Consequently, the Commission has
decided to reschedule the 2015 general elections thus: the national
elections (i.e. Presidential and National Assembly) are now to hold on
March 28th, 2015; while the state elections (Governorship and State
Assembly) are to hold on April 11th, 2015. It should be noted that this
rescheduling falls within the constitutional framework for the conduct
of the elections, notably, Sections 76(2), 116(2), 132(2) and 178(2).
See also Section 25 of the Electoral Act 2010 (As Amended).
For
the avoidance of doubt, we will under no circumstances approve an
arrangement that is not in line with the provisions of our laws.
Our
hope is that with this rescheduling, the security services will do
their best to ensure that the security environment needed for safe and
peaceful conduct of the 2015 elections is rapidly put in place.
We
in INEC reassure all Nigerians and indeed the international community
of our commitment to do everything within the law and to conduct free,
fair, credible and peaceful elections.
We call on the security
agencies to honour their commitment to restore sufficient normalcy for
elections to take place within the period of extension.
We also
call on Nigerians, political parties, candidates and all other
stakeholders to accept this decision in good faith and ensure the
maintenance of peace.
As for us in INEC we’ll endeavour to use the
period of the extension to keep on perfecting our systems and processes
for conducting the best elections in Nigeria’s history. In particular,
we believe that we would resolve all outstanding issues related to
non-collection of PVCs, which agitate the minds of many Nigerians.
Finally,
we wish to call on all Nigerians to accept our decision, which is taken
in good faith and the best interest of deepening democracy ion our
country.
Thank you.
Professor Attahiru M. Jega, OFR
Chairman, INEC
No comments:
Post a Comment